Tuesday, December 23, 2008

The Health Care Cancer, Taxed to Death

As a medical imaging (x-ray) engineer for over 26 years, working and traveling the eastern seaboard & beyond, from Maryland to Miami to Mississippi, I've seen the gamut of America's healthcare system. It is in shambles. Not from the healthcare providers (doctors, nurses, technicians, etc.), but from the bureaucracy (administration, insurance, government, profiteers).
I've done the research, and it's little known fact that nearly 1000 hospitals have closed across America over the last 20 years, 16 in metro Atlanta alone. There are between 300-400 more on the verge as I write this. The need for healthcare hasn't diminished, it's exploded, but the means, availability & affordability have fallen through the floor.
I'm no proponent of socialized medicine as the world understands it, but we see healthcare, like insurance, is a necessary "evil"; a stopgap to protect us from ourselves and each other. Yet, not an "evil", but a necessary "good".
The problem is as long as the motive for its provision is greed & profit, it will not, cannot, succeed. Healthcare must always be deemed a public service, a charity, in our hearts & minds; the same way we provide food, medicine, clothing & shelter for the starving masses in Africa and elsewhere. It is a sacrifice we all must make willingly for ourselves & one another:
"When you cut down yours harvest in your field, and have forgot a sheaf in the field, you shall not go again to fetch it: it shall be for the stranger, for the fatherless, and for the widow: that the LORD your God may bless you in all the work of yours hands." Deut 24:19
"Learn to do well; seek judgment, relieve the oppressed, judge the fatherless, plead for the widow." Is 1:17
"Pure religion and undefiled before God and the Father is this, To visit the fatherless and widows in their affliction, and to keep himself unspotted from the world." James 1:27
"And great multitudes came unto him, having with them those that were lame, blind, dumb, physically disabled, and many others, and cast them down at Jesus' feet; and he healed them." Matt 15:30
"If I then, your Lord and Master, have washed your feet; you also ought to wash one another's feet. For I have given you an example, that you should do as I have done to you." Jn 13:14-15
"Whatsoever ye would that men should do to you; so also do ye to them: for this is the law and the prophets." Matt 7:12
I'm sure this includes all the sick, the ill, the infirm, the damaged & the broken. Much as we give our tithes & offerings for the Lord's service and ministries, we should also deem healthcare the same for one another. It does not, cannot, work any other way...
By the way, one more little known fact: Almost every hospital started in this nation began as a Christian service & outreach to its community.

______NEWS________

At House Party on Health Care, Diagnosis: It’s Broken

By Robert Pear, NYTimes
December 22, 2008

Brendan Smialowski, NY Times
Karima Hijane, flanked by her husband, Theodore A. Kolovos, and Li Yang, needed a year to get correct diagnoses of illnesses. “Instead of being able to focus on my health, I focused on insurance to cover the tests and treatments.

VIENNA, Va. — When a dozen consumers gathered over the weekend to discuss health care at the behest of President-elect Barack Obama, they quickly agreed on one point: they despise health insurance companies.
They also agreed that health care was a right; that insurance should cover “everything,” not just some services; and that coverage should be readily available from the government, as well as from employers.
Those were the conclusions of a house party held here in Northern Virginia at the home of Karima Hijane and Theodore A. Kolovos, information technology consultants who have been married for seven years. It was one of more than 4,200 such events being held around the country from Dec. 15 to 31, as part of an experiment in grass-roots politics and policy-making, to provide recommendations to the president-elect.
“We have to keep the momentum going,” said Ms. Hijane, 34, who was a volunteer in the Obama campaign and is active in women’s health advocacy. “We are not lobbyists. We are simple citizens. We want to make sure that our voices are heard and that health care is reformed.”
One of the people seated around Ms. Hijane’s dining room table, Bruce D. Chatman, worked for I.B.M. for 29 years. Corporations, he said, have too much influence in the legislative process and the health care system. He wants to counterbalance their power with the energy and passion of citizens lobbying for themselves.
Mr. Chatman, a Chicago native who lives in Fort Washington, Md., said he had been inspired by Mr. Obama’s book “The Audacity of Hope” and started working for his campaign as a volunteer in April 2007.
“I don’t believe health care should depend on people making money,” Mr. Chatman said. “The profit motive has to be tempered, especially on the administrative side of the health care business.”
Shiva S. Makki, an economist, complained that in many cases, insurers did not cover the costs of screening procedures and preventive care.
Dr. Lawrence M. Nelson, a scientist at the National Institute of Health who emphasized that he was speaking as a private citizen, said: “The incentives in the current health insurance system are upside down. The less care you provide, the bigger your profits.”
Dr. Nelson said he liked Mr. Obama’s proposal to create a new public plan, similar to Medicare, that would compete with private insurance companies.
Alex R. Lawson, a volunteer in the Obama campaign now trying to build public support for Mr. Obama’s agenda, said a public plan would give people a choice they do not have.
“A public insurance plan would not take anything away,” Mr. Lawson said. “It just adds another option.”
After one speaker expressed a mild concern about too much involvement by the government, Mr. Kolovos said: “Everyone is afraid of government bureaucracy. But what we have now, with the filing and adjudication of insurance claims, is also bureaucratic.”
Several people at the health care forum said they were frustrated by the current arrangement under which health insurance is tied closely to the workplace.
Hamudi Almasri, a 35-year-old information technology consultant at a small company that does work for the Labor Department, said that when he changed jobs, he had to change health plans and doctors.
“If I change employers, why should it be such a hassle?” Mr. Almasri asked.
His wife, Li Yang, said: “When I move from one doctor to another, my information is lost. In many cases, the doctors don’t talk to each other. In a country where information technology is so advanced, there’s no system linking all these doctors together. It’s a hindrance to treatment.”
Ms. Li said she and her husband “had a few surprises” when they started shopping for a better health insurance policy on their own.
“If we wanted a baby,” Ms. Li said, “insurers would not cover the maternity care if conception occurred within six months after we purchased the insurance. We were shocked.”
In many cases, the standard individual insurance policy does not cover maternity care, though such coverage can be bought for an additional premium. Even then, some insurers stipulate that maternity benefits will be available only if a woman waits for a certain amount of time before becoming pregnant.
The Obama transition team asked for “particularly poignant stories to highlight the need for health care reform,” and such stories were abundant at the round table here.
Mr. Almasri said that when his infant daughter had severe eczema, she had to wait several months to see a dermatologist in their H.M.O. network. By then, he said, “the symptoms were all cleared up.”
Ms. Hijane said she had gone from doctor to doctor for more than a year before she got correct diagnoses for premature ovarian failure and celiac disease, a digestive disorder.
“Instead of being able to focus on my health,” Ms. Hijane said, “I focused on insurance to cover the tests and treatments. Everything we did was designed to find a job with good health insurance.”
The Obama transition team did not ask people how a new health care system should be financed, but several people here said that individuals and businesses should have to pay a small health care tax — some preferred to call it a “contribution” — so that everyone could be covered.
Mr. Chatman said he expected insurance companies and others in the health care industry to resist many of Mr. Obama’s proposals.
"This is warfare for the health care of our country,” Mr. Chatman said. “The question is, Will money win, or will the people win? If we lose, we’ll be a second-class country.”

___________


The best and worst states for taxes
Where you live can make a big difference in how much you pay in taxes. So can whether you smoke and how you get to work in the morning.
By Scott McCredie

We pay Uncle Sam the same no matter where we live, but property, gasoline, tobacco, sales and state income taxes are all over the map.

The differences can be extreme. An Alaskan keeps 7 cents more of every dollar than a Vermonter, once cities and the state have grabbed their shares.

Factor in federal taxes and the gap grows even wider. Those who earn more money generally pay a greater percentage of it in federal taxes, so states with a greater percentage of highly paid workers end up paying more.

The state in which residents pay the most in combined state, local and federal taxes, per capita, is Connecticut (38.3%), followed by New York (37.1%), New Jersey (35.6%) and Nevada (35.2%). Oklahoma residents pay the least (27.8%), followed by those in Alabama (28.0%) and Alaska (28.1%).

We're all paying more, though. The U.S. average for state and local taxes in 2007 was 11%, up from 10.8% in 2006. The average combined state, local and federal tab for 2007 was 32.7%, up from 32.3% in 2006 and 30.7% in 1980.

On same income, taxes vary

Of course, even Ted Taxpayer and Debbie Deduction, two people making the same salary and living in the same neighborhood, pay different amounts in taxes. For example, Ted's house is worth more, so he pays higher property taxes; Debbie buys fewer goods and services, thus saving on sales taxes; Ted drives a gas hog and commutes farther to work, costing him more in gas taxes; Debbie doesn't drink or smoke, so she saves on so-called sin taxes. That's not to mention the countless other ways they can incur, avoid or defer taxes.

There are 50 states in the union and, it seems, 50 formulas for collecting taxes. Only seven states -- Alaska, Florida, Nevada, South Dakota, Texas, Washington and Wyoming -- don't assess income taxes, and New Hampshire and Tennessee have income taxes on just dividends and interest. These states balance the lack of income taxes with other taxes, notably sales taxes.

Five states have no sales tax -- Alaska, Montana, Delaware, New Hampshire and Oregon. For 2007, the state with the lowest sales tax rate is Colorado (2.9%); the highest is California (7.25%). Among the sales-tax majority, every state but one (Illinois) exempts prescription drugs, while 31 states exempt food. Counties and municipalities can add their own sales taxes, so comparisons are difficult between states. To find the sales tax in a specific ZIP code, click here.

Gasoline and diesel are taxed at different rates in most states. Besides the straight excise tax, which varies from a low of 4 cents a gallon in Florida to a high of 36 cents in Washington, most states add other gas taxes that increase the toll. The state with the greatest total state tax on gasoline is California (45.5 cents per gallon); the lowest is Alaska (8 cents). Those are levied on top of the federal tax on gasoline, unchanged from last year at 18.4 cents per gallon.

On average, the combined state and federal gasoline tax is 45.8 cents across the nation, making the United States one of the least expensive places in the Western world to buy fuel. In Europe, government taxes make up about 60% of the price of fuel, on average, according to The Christian Science Monitor. According to the American Petroleum Institute, motorists in the western U.S. pay the most in fuel excise taxes (53.9 cents), while those in the South pay the least (38.4 cents).

States lead way on tobacco taxes

The American Lung Association gives the federal government an "F" for its lack of political will to impose greater taxes on tobacco. Although there were rumblings in Congress last year to boost tobacco taxes by 61 cents per pack, no legislation was passed. For each 10% increase in the price of cigarettes, smoking drops by about 4%, experts say.

In 2007, the federal tobacco tax remained at 39 cents a pack, the same as it has been since 2000. State and local taxes on tobacco products, however, have been steadily rising. For example, Kentucky, one of the top tobacco growers in the nation, had the lowest cigarette tax in the country (3 cents a pack) until 2005, when it raised the tax to 30 cents, where it remains. New Jersey, for the third year in a row, collects the heftiest tax on cigarettes -- $2.58 per pack -- followed by Rhode Island ($2.46) and Washington ($2.03). South Carolina, among the 21 states that grow tobacco, collects 7 cents a pack, still the lowest tax in the nation.

And coming up on the outside . . .

Are there any new trends showing up in the way states apply taxes?

Bill Ahern, the Tax Foundation's director of communications, sees several patterns developing. One is that state legislatures are coming up with plans that shift taxes from state residents to those who live outside the state.

How can this sleight of hand occur? By raising taxes on commercial property and vacation homes, some of which are owned by "nonvoting, nonresidents," Ahern says. "On the same theme," he continued, "there are numerous plans to raise taxes on lodging, rental cars, restaurant meals and other tourism targets. They are pitched to voters as a way to extract revenue from out-of-staters."

Another trend Ahern notes is the larger percentage of state revenue being generated from what some call gaming revenue and others term gambling losses. "In the early 1960s," Ahern says, "lotteries were illegal or unconstitutional in every state. Now 42 states have done a 180 and promote lottery tickets as if they were mother's milk. Last year was the first year that any state got more than 10% of its revenue from the lottery. Rhode Island did that, but it will be joined by others soon."

Taxes by state


SalesGas/gal.Cig./packBeer/gal.State burdenRankState/Fed. burdenRank

Alabama

4.0%

$0.20

$0.43

$1.05

8.8%

46

28.0%

49

Alaska

none

$0.08

$2.00

$1.07

6.6%

50

28.1%

48

Arizona

5.6%*

$0.19

$2.00

$0.16

10.3%

31

31.3%

25

Arkansas

6.0%

$0.22

$0.59

$0.21

11.3%

13

30.7%

32

California

7.3%

$0.46

$0.87

$0.20

11.5%

12

34.3%

8

Colorado

2.9%

$0.22

$0.84

$0.08

10.4%

30

31.8%

23

Connecticut

6.0%

$0.44

$2.00

$0.20

12.2%

8

38.3%

1

Delaware

none*

$0.23

$1.15

$0.16

8.8%

47

31.2%

26

Florida

6.0%

$0.33

$0.34

$0.48

10.0%

38

33.6%

12

Georgia

4.0%

$0.26

$0.37

$0.48

10.3%

32

30.9%

28

Hawaii

4%*

$0.33

$1.80

$0.93

12.4%

6

33.0%

16

Idaho

6.0%

$0.25

$0.57

$0.15

10.1%

35

29.6%

42

Illinois

6.3%

$0.40

$0.98

$0.19

10.8%

22

33.2%

14

Indiana

6.0%

$0.32

$1.00

$0.12

10.7%

25

30.8%

30

Iowa

5.0%

$0.22

$1.36

$0.19

11.0%

18

30.6%

33

Kansas

5.3%

$0.25

$0.79

$0.18

11.2%

15

31.0%

27

Kentucky

6%*

$0.19

$0.30

$0.08

10.9%

20

30.4%

34

Louisiana

4.0%

$0.20

$0.36

$0.32

11.0%

17

29.1%

44

Maine

5.0%

$0.29

$2.00

$0.35

14.0%

2

33.9%

10

Maryland

6.0%

$0.24

$2.00

$0.09

10.8%

23

33.1%

15

Massachusetts

5.0%

$0.24

$1.51

$0.11

10.6%

28

34.4%

7

Michigan

6.0%

$0.36

$2.00

$0.20

11.2%

14

31.9%

21

Minnesota

6.5%

$0.22

$1.49

$0.15

11.5%

11

33.9%

11

Mississippi

7.0%

$0.19

$0.18

$0.43

10.5%

29

28.1%

47

Missouri

4.2%

$0.18

$0.17

$0.06

10.1%

34

30.2%

38

Montana

none

$0.28

$1.70

$0.14

9.7%

41

29.8%

39

Nebraska

5.5%

$0.24

$0.64

$0.31

11.9%

9

31.8%

22

Nevada

6.5%

$0.33

$0.80

$0.16

10.1%

36

35.2%

4

New Hampshire

none*

$0.20

$1.08

$0.30

8.0%

49

30.8%

29

New Jersey

7.0%

$0.15

$2.58

$0.12

11.6%

10

35.6%

3

New Mexico

5.0%

$0.18

$0.91

$0.41

9.8%

40

28.8%

45

New York

4.0%

$0.41

$1.50

$0.11

13.8%

3

37.1%

2

N. Carolina

4.3%

$0.30

$0.35

$0.53

11.0%

19

31.3%

24

N. Dakota

5.0%

$0.23

$0.44

$0.16

9.9%

39

30.2%

37

Ohio

5.5%*

$0.28

$1.25

$0.18

12.4%

5

32.4%

18

Oklahoma

4.5%

$0.17

$1.03

$0.40

9.0%

45

27.8%

50

Oregon

none

$0.25

$1.18

$0.08

10.0%

37

30.7%

31

Pennsylvania

6.0%

$0.32

$1.35

$0.08

10.8%

24

31.9%

20

Rhode Island

7.0%

$0.31

$2.46

$0.10

12.7%

4

35.1%

6

S. Carolina

6.0%

$0.17

$0.07

$0.77

10.7%

26

30.3%

35

S. Dakota

4.0%

$0.24

$1.53

$0.27

9.0%

44

29.3%

43

Tennessee

7.0%

$0.21

$0.62

$0.14

8.5%

48

28.8%

46

Texas

6.25%*

$0.20

$1.41

$0.19

9.3%

43

29.8%

41

Utah

4.7%

$0.25

$0.70

$0.41

10.7%

27

30.3%

36

Vermont

6.0%

$0.20

$1.79

$0.27

14.1%

1

35.1%

5

Virginia

5.0%

$0.20

$0.30

$0.26

10.2%

33

32.9%

17

Washington

6.5%*

$0.36

$2.03

$0.26

11.1%

16

34.0%

9

West Virginia

6.0%

$0.32

$0.55

$0.18

10.9%

21

29.8%

40

Wisconsin

5.0%

$0.33

$1.77

$0.06

12.3%

7

33.3%

13

Wyoming

4.0%

$0.14

$0.60

$0.02

9.5%

42

32.1%

19

*State collects a gross-receipts tax that is applied before the retail level.



Saturday, December 20, 2008

Music Industry to Abandon Mass Lawsuits

While I in no way condone piracy of any sort, the RIAA's heavy-handed approach with mass lawsuits, was way over the line in dealing with the issue. We're all guilty sinners of many crimes, against both God & man, but man's skewed ideology of right vs wrong, legal vs illegal, moral vs amoral, ethical vs unethical is more often contrary to what YHWH outlines in the Holy Scriptures.
Music and video are arts for the ears, eyes and the heart. Once it is captured within the soul, it becomes ingrained, hardly to be stripped away. Yes, there should be compensatory means for the artist, but the RIAA has gotten the method & motivation for such all out of whack.

"I will remember my song in the night; I will speak with my own heart, and my spirit carefully searches. " Ps 77:6
"YHWH is my strength and my shield; my heart trusted in Him, and I am helped; yea, my heart greatly rejoices; and I will thank Him with my song." Ps 28:7
"O Elohim, my heart is fixed; I will sing and give praise, even with my glory." Ps 108:1
"Sing unto Him a new song; play skilfully amid shouts of joy." Ps 33:3

All of the arts & crafts (music, video, painting, sculpture, etc.) are as critical & needful for the artist to express as it is hoped for the audience to receive. Whenever lucre is the primary goal of any endeavor, the outcome is as wretched as the input...


__________NEWS_____________

Music Industry to Abandon Mass Lawsuits

By SARAH MCBRIDE and ETHAN SMITH, Wall Street Journal

After years of suing thousands of people for allegedly stealing music via the Internet, the recording industry is set to drop its legal assault as it searches for more effective ways to combat online music piracy.

The decision represents an abrupt shift of strategy for the industry, which has opened legal proceedings against about 35,000 people since 2003. Critics say the legal offensive ultimately did little to stem the tide of illegally downloaded music. And it created a public-relations disaster for the industry, whose lawsuits targeted, among others, several single mothers, a dead person and a 13-year-old girl.

[us album sales]

Instead, the Recording Industry Association of America said it plans to try an approach that relies on the cooperation of Internet-service providers. The trade group said it has hashed out preliminary agreements with major ISPs under which it will send an email to the provider when it finds a provider's customers making music available online for others to take.

Depending on the agreement, the ISP will either forward the note to customers, or alert customers that they appear to be uploading music illegally, and ask them to stop. If the customers continue the file-sharing, they will get one or two more emails, perhaps accompanied by slower service from the provider. Finally, the ISP may cut off their access altogether.

The RIAA said it has agreements in principle with some ISPs, but declined to say which ones. But ISPs, which are increasingly cutting content deals of their own with entertainment companies, may have more incentive to work with the music labels now than in previous years.

The new approach dispenses with one of the most contentious parts of the lawsuit strategy, which involved filing lawsuits requiring ISPs to disclose the identities of file sharers. Under the new strategy, the RIAA would forward its emails to the ISPs without demanding to know the customers' identity.

Though the industry group is reserving the right to sue people who are particularly heavy file sharers, or who ignore repeated warnings, it expects its lawsuits to decline to a trickle. The group stopped filing mass lawsuits early this fall.

It isn't clear that the new strategy will work or how effective the collaboration with the ISPs will be. "There isn't any silver-bullet anti-piracy solution," said Eric Garland, president of BigChampagne LLC, a piracy consulting company.

Mr. Garland said he likes the idea of a solution that works more with consumers. In the years since the RIAA began its mass legal action, "It has become abundantly clear that the carrot is far more important than the stick." Indeed, many in the music industry felt the lawsuits had outlived their usefulness.

"I'd give them credit for stopping what they've already been doing because it's been so destructive," said Brian Toder, who represents a Minnesota mother involved in a high-profile file-sharing case. But his client isn't off the hook. The RIAA said it plans to continue with outstanding lawsuits.

Over the summer, New York State Attorney General Andrew Cuomo began brokering an agreement between the recording industry and the ISPs that would address both sides' piracy concerns. "We wanted to end the litigation," said Steven Cohen, Mr. Cuomo's chief of staff. "It's not helpful."

As the RIAA worked to cut deals with individual ISPs, Mr. Cuomo's office started working on a broader plan under which major ISPs would agree to work to prevent illegal file-sharing.

The RIAA believes the new strategy will reach more people, which itself is a deterrent. "Part of the issue with infringement is for people to be aware that their actions are not anonymous," said Mitch Bainwol, the group's chairman.

Mr. Bainwol said that while he thought the litigation had been effective in some regards, new methods were now available to the industry. "Over the course of five years, the marketplace has changed," he said in an interview. Litigation, he said, was successful in raising the public's awareness that file-sharing is illegal, but now he wants to try a strategy he thinks could prove more successful.

The RIAA says piracy would have been even worse without the lawsuits. Citing data from consulting firm NPD Group Inc., the industry says the percentage of Internet users who download music over the Internet has remained fairly constant, hovering around 19% over the past few years. However, the volume of music files shared over the Internet has grown steadily.

Meanwhile, music sales continue to fall. In 2003, the industry sold 656 million albums. In 2007, the number fell to 500 million CDs and digital albums, plus 844 million paid individual song downloads -- hardly enough to make up the decline in album sales. _________________________________

(AP)LOS ANGELES - The group representing the U.S. recording industry said Friday it has abandoned its policy of suing people for sharing songs protected by copyright and will work with Internet service providers to cut abusers' access if they ignore repeated warnings.

The move ends a controversial program that saw the Recording Industry Association of America sue about 35,000 people since 2003 for swapping songs online. Because of high legal costs for defenders, virtually all of those hit with lawsuits settled, on average for around $3,500. The association's legal costs, in the meantime, exceeded the settlement money it brought in.

The association said Friday that it stopped sending out new lawsuits and warnings in August, and then agreed with several leading U.S. Internet service providers, without naming which ones, to notify alleged illegal file-sharers and cut off service if they failed to stop.

It credited the lawsuit campaign with raising awareness of piracy and keeping the number of illegal file-sharers in check while the legal market for digital music took off. With two weeks left in the year, legitimate sales of digital music tracks soared for the first time past the 1 billion mark, up 28 percent over all of last year, according to Nielsen Soundscan.

"We're at a point where there's a sense of comfort that we can replace one form of deterrent with another form of deterrent," said RIAA Chairman and Chief Executive Mitch Bainwol. "Filing lawsuits as a strategy to deal with a big problem was not our first choice five years ago."

The new notification program is also more efficient, he said, having sent out more notices in the few months since it started than in the five years of the lawsuit campaign.

"It's much easier to send notices than it is to file lawsuits," Bainwol said.

The decision to scrap the legal attack was first reported in The Wall Street Journal.

The group says it will still continue to litigate outstanding cases, most of which are in the pre-lawsuit warning stage, but some of which are before the courts.

The decision to press on with existing cases drew the ire of Harvard Law professor Charles Nesson, who is defending a Boston University graduate student targeted in one of the music industry's lawsuits.

"If it's a bad idea, it's a bad idea," said Nesson. He is challenging the constitutionality of the suits, which, based on the Digital Theft Deterrence and Copyright Damages Improvement Act of 1999, can impose damages of $150,000 per infringement, far in excess of the actual damage caused.

Nesson's client, Joel Tenenbaum, faces the possibility of more than $1 million in damages for allegedly downloading seven songs illegally, which Nesson called "cruel and unusual punishment." The case is set to go to trial in district court in Massachusetts on Jan. 22.

Brian Toder, a lawyer with Chestnut & Cambronne in Minneapolis, who defended single mother Jammie Thomas in a copyright suit filed by the RIAA, said he is also set to retry the case March 9 after a judge threw out a $222,000 decision against her.

"I think it's a good thing that they've ended this campaign of going after people," Toder said.

"But they need to change how people spend money on records," he said. "People like to share music. The Internet makes it so easy. They have to do something to change this business model of theirs."



Sunday, December 14, 2008

Bad Times Draw Bigger Crowds to Churches

I shouldn't expect so much from a mainline media reporter, given the context of how he portrays this article. If you garner this reporting as a whole, the woefully sad point is not what it says, but what it doesn't say...
If you'll take note, the words Christianity & God are only mentioned passively. Nowhere is the name of Jesus or Christ or the Bible & the Gospel stated. Scripture is only a reference. It appears the size of the congregations & church growth opportunity are the prizes to be gained, rather than presenting salvation in Christ to a dying world. Sin, or its wages, or repentance of an adulterous nation could hardly be deemed newsworthy in such an item.
One may surmise it is exactly YHWH's design to use hard times to awaken humans to their frailty and need of Him, as pensively noted by the Spiritual Awakenings in our past history. But, it is plainly seen that this reporter doesn't "get" it, nor does our nation, nor its leaders.
"King Agrippa, don't you believe the prophets? I know you believe. Then Agrippa said unto Paul, Almost you persuade me to be a Christian." Acts 26:27-28
While it's joyful to know greater opportunity to preach the Gospel of Christ is upon us, and I fervently pray the Holy Spirit to bring Revival to our land, but swelled church attendance does not a Christian (nation) make...

______________NEWS_____________

Bad Times Draw Bigger Crowds to Churches

James Estrin/The New York Times

Attendance is up at Shelter Rock Church on Long Island.

By PAUL VITELLO
Published: December 13, 2008

The sudden crush of worshipers packing the small evangelical Shelter Rock Church in Manhasset, N.Y. — a Long Island hamlet of yacht clubs and hedge fund managers — forced the pastor to set up an overflow room with closed-circuit TV and 100 folding chairs, which have been filled for six Sundays straight.


James Estrin/The New York Times

Shelter Rock Church is an evangelical church that has prospered in the wealthy community of Manhasset, N.Y.

In Seattle, the Mars Hill Church, one of the fastest-growing evangelical churches in the country, grew to 7,000 members this fall, up 1,000 in a year. At the Life Christian Church in West Orange, N.J., prayer requests have doubled — almost all of them aimed at getting or keeping jobs.

Like evangelical churches around the country, the three churches have enjoyed steady growth over the last decade. But since September, pastors nationwide say they have seen such a burst of new interest that they find themselves contending with powerful conflicting emotions — deep empathy and quiet excitement — as they re-encounter an old piece of religious lore:

Bad times are good for evangelical churches.

“It’s a wonderful time, a great evangelistic opportunity for us,” said the Rev. A. R. Bernard, founder and senior pastor of the Christian Cultural Center in Brooklyn, New York’s largest evangelical congregation, where regulars are arriving earlier to get a seat. “When people are shaken to the core, it can open doors.”

Nationwide, congregations large and small are presenting programs of practical advice for people in fiscal straits — from a homegrown series on “Financial Peace” at a Midtown Manhattan church called the Journey, to the “Good Sense” program developed at the 20,000-member Willow Creek Community Church in South Barrington, Ill., and now offered at churches all over the country.

Many ministers have for the moment jettisoned standard sermons on marriage and the Beatitudes to preach instead about the theological meaning of the downturn.

The Jehovah’s Witnesses, who moved much of their door-to-door evangelizing to the night shift 10 years ago because so few people were home during the day, returned to daylight witnessing this year. “People are out of work, and they are answering the door,” said a spokesman, J. R. Brown.

Mr. Bernard plans to start 100 prayer groups next year, using a model conceived by the megachurch pastor Rick Warren, to “foster spiritual dialogue in these times” in small gatherings around the city.

A recent spot check of some large Roman Catholic parishes and mainline Protestant churches around the nation indicated attendance increases there, too. But they were nowhere near as striking as those reported by congregations describing themselves as evangelical, a term generally applied to churches that stress the literal authority of Scripture and the importance of personal conversion, or being “born again.”

Part of the evangelicals’ new excitement is rooted in a communal belief that the big Christian revivals of the 19th century, known as the second and third Great Awakenings, were touched off by economic panics. Historians of religion do not buy it, but the notion “has always lived in the lore of evangelism,” said Tony Carnes, a sociologist who studies religion.

A study last year may lend some credence to the legend. In “Praying for Recession: The Business Cycle and Protestant Religiosity in the United States,” David Beckworth, an assistant professor of economics at Texas State University, looked at long-established trend lines showing the growth of evangelical congregations and the decline of mainline churches and found a more telling detail: During each recession cycle between 1968 and 2004, the rate of growth in evangelical churches jumped by 50 percent. By comparison, mainline Protestant churches continued their decline during recessions, though a bit more slowly.

The little-noticed study began receiving attention from some preachers in September, when the stock market began its free fall. With the swelling attendance they were seeing, and a sense that worldwide calamities come along only once in an evangelist’s lifetime, the study has encouraged some to think big.

“I found it very exciting, and I called up that fellow to tell him so,” said the Rev. Don MacKintosh, a Seventh Day Adventist televangelist in California who contacted Dr. Beckworth a few weeks ago after hearing word of his paper from another preacher. “We need to leverage this moment, because every Christian revival in this country’s history has come off a period of rampant greed and fear. That’s what we’re in today — the time of fear and greed.”

Frank O’Neill, 54, a manager who lost his job at Morgan Stanley this year, said the “humbling experience” of unemployment made him cast about for a more personal relationship with God than he was able to find in the Catholicism of his youth. In joining the Shelter Rock Church on Long Island, he said, he found a deeper sense of “God’s authority over everything — I feel him walking with me.”

The sense of historic moment is underscored especially for evangelicals in New York who celebrated the 150th anniversary last year of the Fulton Street Prayer Revival, one of the major religious resurgences in America. Also known as the Businessmen’s Revival, it started during the Panic of 1857 with a noon prayer meeting among traders and financiers in Manhattan’s financial district.

Over the next few years, it led to tens of thousands of conversions in the United States, and inspired the volunteerism movement behind the founding of the Salvation Army, said the Rev. McKenzie Pier, president of the New York City Leadership Center, an evangelical pastors’ group that marked the anniversary with a three-day conference at the Hilton New York. “The conditions of the Businessmen’s Revival bear great similarities to what’s going on today,” he said. “People are losing a lot of money.”

But why the evangelical churches seem to thrive especially in hard times is a Rorschach test of perspective.

For some evangelicals, the answer is obvious. ”We have the greatest product on earth,” said the Rev. Steve Tomlinson, senior pastor of the Shelter Rock Church.

Dr. Beckworth, a macroeconomist, posited another theory: though expanding demographically since becoming the nation’s largest religious group in the 1990s, evangelicals as a whole still tend to be less affluent than members of mainline churches, and therefore depend on their church communities more during tough times, for material as well as spiritual support. In good times, he said, they are more likely to work on Sundays, which may explain a slower rate of growth among evangelical churches in nonrecession years.

Msgr. Thomas McSweeney, who writes columns for Catholic publications and appears on MSNBC as a religion consultant, said the growth is fed by evangelicals’ flexibility: “Their tradition allows them to do things from the pulpit we don’t do — like ‘Hey! I need somebody to take Mrs. McSweeney to the doctor on Tuesday,’ or ‘We need volunteers at the soup kitchen tomorrow.’ ”

In a cascading financial crisis, he said, a pastor can discard a sermon prescribed by the liturgical calendar and directly address the anxiety in the air. “I know a lot of you are feeling pain today,” he said, as if speaking from the pulpit. “And we’re going to do something about that.”

But a recession also means fewer dollars in the collection basket.

Few evangelical churches have endowments to compare with the older mainline Protestant congregations.

“We are at the front end of a $10 million building program,” said the Rev. Terry Smith, pastor of the Life Christian Church in West Orange, N.J. “Am I worried about that? Yes. But right now, I’m more worried about my congregation.” A husband and wife, he said, were both fired the same day from Goldman Sachs; another man inherited the workload of four co-workers who were let go, and expects to be the next to leave. “Having the conversations I’m having,” Mr. Smith said, “it’s hard to think about anything else.”

At the Shelter Rock Church, many newcomers have been invited by members who knew they had recently lost jobs. On a recent Sunday, new faces included a hedge fund manager and an investment banker, both laid off, who were friends of Steve Leondis, a cheerful business executive who has been a church member for four years. The two newcomers, both Catholics, declined to be interviewed, but Mr. Leondis said they agreed to attend Shelter Rock to hear Mr. Tomlinson’s sermon series, “Faith in Unstable Times.”

“They wanted something that pertained to them,” he said, “some comfort that pertained to their situations.”

Mr. Tomlinson and his staff in Manhasset and at a satellite church in nearby Syosset have recently discussed hiring an executive pastor to take over administrative work, so they can spend more time pastoring.

“There are a lot of walking wounded in this town,” he said.

Saturday, December 13, 2008

Lies built upon Lies...

Consider for a moment; What if everything you knew, or thought you knew, was and is...A Lie. Ponder that all you've been taught & read & heard which has taken root in your heart, mind & soul is nothing but fabrication. And, if the light of Truth suddenly blasted brightly through the lies & deceit, could you handle, could you accept REAL Truth? Sadly, most would rather believe a lie. The carnal mind cannot fathom stark reality, but would rather placate the senses with more convenient fiction. Every pursuit of man; science, history, society, morality, etc., becomes a house of straw built upon shifting sand.

It becomes glaringly apparent in these troubling times that our government, our media, our public schools, our financial system, our business & industry, even many churches, mosques & synagogues prevaricate & propagate untruths, half-truths, deceit and deception. For a variety of excuses, rationalizations & justifications, lies have become the foundation of American society. And, as if lies weren't enough, the denial & denying of truth is just as rampant. Read on...

"For the mystery of iniquity does already work: ...Even him, whose coming is after the working of Satan with all power and signs and lying wonders, And with all delusion of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved. And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie: That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness." II Th 2:7-12
"Sanctify them through your truth: your word is truth." Jn 17:17

___________NEWS____________
Federal Reserve Refuses to Disclose Loan Recipients of $2 Trillion

By Mark Pittman, Bloomberg News

Dec. 12 (Bloomberg) -- The Federal Reserve refused a request by Bloomberg News to disclose the recipients of more than $2 trillion of emergency loans from U.S. taxpayers and the assets the central bank is accepting as collateral.

Bloomberg filed suit Nov. 7 under the U.S. Freedom of Information Act requesting details about the terms of 11 Fed lending programs, most created during the deepest financial crisis since the Great Depression.

The Fed responded Dec. 8, saying it’s allowed to withhold internal memos as well as information about trade secrets and commercial information. The institution confirmed that a records search found 231 pages of documents pertaining to some of the requests.

“If they told us what they held, we would know the potential losses that the government may take and that’s what they don’t want us to know,” said Carlos Mendez, a senior managing director at New York-based ICP Capital LLC, which oversees $22 billion in assets.

The Fed stepped into a rescue role that was the original purpose of the Treasury’s $700 billion Troubled Asset Relief Program. The central bank loans don’t have the oversight safeguards that Congress imposed upon the TARP.

Total Fed lending exceeded $2 trillion for the first time Nov. 6. It rose by 138 percent, or $1.23 trillion, in the 12 weeks since Sept. 14, when central bank governors relaxed collateral standards to accept securities that weren’t rated AAA.

‘Been Bamboozled’

Congress is demanding more transparency from the Fed and Treasury on bailout, most recently during Dec. 10 hearings by the House Financial Services committee when Representative David Scott, a Georgia Democrat, said Americans had “been bamboozled.”

Bloomberg News, a unit of New York-based Bloomberg LP, on May 21 asked the Fed to provide data on collateral posted from April 4 to May 20. The central bank said on June 19 that it needed until July 3 to search documents and determine whether it would make them public. Bloomberg didn’t receive a formal response that would let it file an appeal within the legal time limit.

On Oct. 25, Bloomberg filed another request, expanding the range of when the collateral was posted. It filed suit Nov. 7.

In response to Bloomberg’s request, the Fed said the U.S. is facing “an unprecedented crisis” in which “loss in confidence in and between financial institutions can occur with lightning speed and devastating effects.”

Data Provider

The Fed supplied copies of three e-mails in response to a request that it disclose the identities of those supplying data on collateral as well as their contracts.

While the senders and recipients of the messages were revealed, the contents were erased except for two phrases identifying a vendor as “IDC.” One of the e-mails’ subject lines refers to “Interactive Data -- Auction Rate Security Advisory May 1, 2008.”

Brian Willinsky, a spokesman for Bedford, Massachusetts- based Interactive Data Corp., a seller of fixed-income securities information, declined to comment.

“Notwithstanding calls for enhanced transparency, the Board must protect against the substantial, multiple harms that might result from disclosure,” Jennifer J. Johnson, the secretary for the Fed’s Board of Governors, said in a letter e-mailed to Bloomberg News.

‘Dangerous Step’

“In its considered judgment and in view of current circumstances, it would be a dangerous step to release this otherwise confidential information,” she wrote.

New York-based Citigroup Inc., which is shrinking its global workforce of 352,000 through asset sales and job cuts, is among the nine biggest banks receiving $125 billion in capital from the TARP since it was signed into law Oct. 3. More than 170 regional lenders are seeking an additional $74 billion.

Fed Chairman Ben S. Bernanke and Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson said in September they would meet congressional demands for transparency in a $700 billion bailout of the banking system.

The Freedom of Information Act obliges federal agencies to make government documents available to the press and public. The Bloomberg lawsuit, filed in New York, doesn’t seek money damages.

‘Right to Know’

“There has to be something they can tell the public because we have a right to know what they are doing,” said Lucy Dalglish, executive director of the Arlington, Virginia-based Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press.

“It would really be a shame if we have to find this out 10 years from now after some really nasty class-action suit and our financial system has completely collapsed,” she said.

The Fed’s five-page response to Bloomberg may be “unprecedented” because the board usually doesn’t go into such detail about its position, said Lee Levine, a partner at Levine Sullivan Koch & Schulz LLP in Washington.

“This is uncharted territory,” said Levine during an interview from his New York office. “The Freedom of Information Act wasn’t built to anticipate this situation and that’s evident from the way the Fed tried to shoehorn their argument into the trade-secrets exemption.”

The Fed lent cash and government bonds to banks that handed over collateral including stocks and subprime and structured securities such as collateralized debt obligations, according to the Fed Web site.

Borrowers include the now-bankrupt Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc., Citigroup and New York-based JPMorgan Chase & Co., the country’s biggest bank by assets.

Banks oppose any release of information because that might signal weakness and spur short-selling or a run by depositors, Scott Talbott, senior vice president of government affairs for the Financial Services Roundtable, a Washington trade group, said in an interview last month.

‘Complete Truth’

“Americans don’t want to get blindsided anymore,” Mendez said in an interview. “They don’t want it sugarcoated or whitewashed. They want the complete truth. The truth is we can’t take all the pain right now.”

The Bloomberg lawsuit said the collateral lists “are central to understanding and assessing the government’s response to the most cataclysmic financial crisis in America since the Great Depression.”

In response, the Fed argued that the trade-secret exemption could be expanded to include potential harm to any of the central bank’s customers, said Bruce Johnson, a lawyer at Davis Wright Tremaine LLP in Seattle. That expansion is not contained in the freedom-of-information law, Johnson said.

“I understand where they are coming from bureaucratically, but that means it’s all the more necessary for taxpayers to know what exactly is going on because of all the money that is being hurled at the banking system,” Johnson said.

The Bloomberg lawsuit is Bloomberg LP v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, 08-CV-9595, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York (Manhattan).

__________________________

Fifth Georgia bank closed, 24th nationwide failure in 2008

NEW YORK — Regulators on Friday closed Haven Trust Bank, marking the 24th U.S. bank failure this year, and the fifth in Georgia.

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. was appointed receiver of the Duluth, Ga.-based bank, which had total assets of $572 million and deposits of $515 million as of Dec. 8.

The FDIC said Winston-Salem, N.C.-based BB&T has agreed to assume all of the bank's deposits, including those that exceeded the insurance limit, for $112,000. BB&T will also buy about $55 million of the failed bank's assets; the FDIC will retain the rest for later disposition.

The four branches of Haven Trust Bank will reopen on Monday as BB&T branches, and deposits will continue to be insured by the FDIC. Regular deposit accounts are now insured up to $250,000 as part of the financial rescue law enacted in early October.

The agency said depositors will continue to have full access to their money.

The FDIC estimated that the resolution of Haven Trust Bank will cost the federal deposit insurance fund $200 million.

The 24 U.S. bank failures so far this year compare with three for all of 2007 and are far more than in the previous five years combined. It's expected that many more banks won't survive the next year of economic turmoil. The pressures of tumbling home prices, rising foreclosures and tighter credit have been battering financial firms nationwide.

Of the roughly 8,500 federally insured banks and thrifts, the FDIC had 171 on its confidential list of troubled institutions as of Sept. 30 — a nearly 50% jump from the second quarter and the highest tally since late 1995.

Update:

Sanderson State Bank of Sanderson, Texas fails: 25th of year

By Wallace Witkowski
Last update: 6:31 p.m. EST Dec. 12, 2008
SAN FRANCISCO (MarketWatch) -- The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation said late Friday that the Sanderson State Bank of Sanderson, Texas, was closed by the Texas Department of Banking, making it the 25th U.S. bank failure of the year. The Pecos County State Bank of Fort Stockton, Texas, will assume all of Sanderson's deposits. As of Dec. 3, Sanderson had total assets of $37 million and total deposits of $27.9 million. Pecos County State Bank will assume all of the deposits for a 0.55% premium, and buy $3.8 million of assets, with the option to buy owned premises and equipment. It was the second bank failure announced by the FDIC on Friday.

____________________________

Court considers ACLU demand for Bible ban
School policy targeted for treating Scriptures equally

Posted: December 12, 2008
12:25 am Eastern,
WorldNetDaily


A federal appeals court is considering a Missouri dispute in which the American Civil Liberties Union challenged a school district policy that treated the Bible the same as other books and demanded the authority to veto what would be handed out to students.

The controversy arose over a request by the Gideons to distribute Bibles in the South Iron School District, which has a neutral policy that allows distribution of outside literature by various groups under set rules, irrespective of whether the literature is secular or religious.

"Under this policy, an outside group may offer Bibles to students who wish to take them in the same manner as other nonreligious groups are permitted to distribute secular literature," according to Liberty Counsel, whose chief, Mathew Staver, argued the case today before a panel of the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals in St. Louis.

The Bible distribution was targeted by an ACLU lawsuit in 2006, and the school responded with a written policy that treats all literature the same.

But at the trial court level, Judge Catherine Perry issued an order specifically prohibiting distribution of the Bible, and the Bible alone, after calling it an "instrument of religion."

She said the district's neutral treatment of literature is unacceptable, because it actually would allow the distribution of the Bible.

"The ruling presented a novel (and unconstitutional) theory that a private third party (like the ACLU) must have the opportunity to veto the distribution request of the private applicant," Liberty Counsel said. "The veto power, the judge wrote, must be provided to veto religious, but not secular, literature."

Staver said the Constitution simply doesn't allow the Bible to be singled out, like contraband, for special penalties.

"How ironic that in America, until recent times, the Bible formed the basis of education, and now its mere presence is radioactive in the opinion of some judges," he said. "The Founders never envisioned such open hostility toward the Christian religion as we see today in some venues. To single out the Bible alone for discriminatory treatment harkens back to the Dark Ages. America deserves better. Our Constitution should be respected, not disregarded."

Staver told WND that a decision is not expected to be announced for about two months.

He said the lower court's ban targets only the Bible.

"The Quran is OK, and other kinds of religious texts; just not the Bible. The Bible alone is impermissible in the public school," he said.

WND reported earlier when a brief was filed with the federal appeals court.

Among the groups that have distributed material at the school are the Army Corps of Engineers, Red Cross, Girl Scouts, Boy Scouts, Iron County Health Department, Missouri Water Patrol, Missouri Highland Healthcare and Union Pacific Railroad, officials said.

"The ACLU might not like the fact that equal access also means equal treatment for religious speech, but the Constitution requires equal treatment. The First Amendment protects private religious viewpoints. Hecklers may heckle but they may not veto private religious speech. ... Religious viewpoints have Constitutional protection," Staver said.

The minutes from board meetings noted the board president "explained to the board at this point, we are an open forum and any group can request to enter our school and distribute materials – atheists, communists, gay rights, etc." The minutes note the board members acknowledged the policy.

However, Perry banned the district "from distributing or allowing distribution of Bibles to elementary school children on school property at any time during the school day."

"The district court also opined that 'Bibles are different' from other forms of religious literature," Liberty Counsel said.

The Gideons, a group founded in the late 1800s, have as their "sole purpose" the goal "to win men, women, boys and girls to a saving knowledge of the Lord Jesus Christ through association for service, personal testimony, and distributing the Bible in the human traffic lanes and streams of everyday life."

Gideons have placed the Bible in 181 nations in 82 different languages over the years.

The organization focuses on hotels and motels, hospitals and nursing homes, schools, colleges and universities, the military, law enforcement, prisons and jails.

"The demand for Scriptures in these areas far exceeds our supplies that we are able to purchase through our donations," the group said. Much more could be done – if funds were available. However, we are placing and distributing more than one million copies of the Word of God, at no cost, every seven days in these areas. ..."

The Gideons is the oldest Christian business and professional men's association in the U.S.